Gaunilo's argument from Anselm's point of view Essay

Gaunilos argument from Anselms point of view - Essay ExampleGaunilo, a fellow monk and believer sought to oppose Anselms argument, saying it would force people to conclude existence of former(a) non- existent things. His critic is usually described by philosophers as an overload idea, because he does not show how Anselms ideas are wrong but rather how it unsound in all applications, if it is unsound in champion. Gaunilo argues that god in the argument placed by Anselm can be replaced by anything, in his case, the perfect island. Suppose we replace God with an island, this is how it would flow. Imagine a perfect island of which none like it is conceivable, now this idea exists in your mind. The existence of a perfect island in both the mind and in reality is great than if it only exists in the mind. If the concept of a perfect island exists in the mind then we can imagine an island better than the perfect island. But we cannot imagine an island great than this we can conclude that this perfect island exists. In defense of his theory, Anselm would argue that the idea of what entails a perfect island varies from one person to another, for example, to me, a perfect island would be one with sandy beaches and human occupation, while to another that would be one that is deserted and with abundance of lets say fruits. ... In the second way he argues that no object can create itself, in that respectfore there must be a first cause (God), who began the chain of existence of all things. doubting Thomas reconciled faith and reason, by borrowing heavily from Aristotle. The second cause is explained using the following steps 1) The natural world has things that are caused by other things. There is therefore an order of efficient causes in the sensible world. Every sensible event that takes place has a distinct cause. 2) In the natural world, naught can be the cause of itself. There is hardly a case in which an event in the natural world was caused by itself. Events occu r that were caused by events rate than themselves. 3) In the natural world there cannot be an endless string of objects causing other objects to exist. We can therefore say that causes are preceded by effects. 4) There exists a supernatural being that causes the first chain of events therefore the cause of such events is called God. The supernatural force has to be a person with enormous power and with divine attributes such as being omnipresent. These inferences are drawn from nature and causation. This argument has some flaws for example the identity of the cause does not maintain to be God. It is flawed to assume that the cause of the events that take place in nature has to originate from one location for all of them. There is a opening night that there may be multiple causes, not related to each other. Moreover, the cause does not have to be supernatural, but could be other causes such as the universe. In conclusion, this theory begs the question as to why infinite causal ch ains are impossible, for example it can be assumed that there exists no beginning, middle or end time, therefore the